Can a judge in AR hold a trial until 4 AM for intent to distribute case?

Question

Can a judge hold a criminal trial for possession with intent to distribute until 4 AM? During the trial in Arkansas, attendees expressed fatigue, and the court continued despite the late hours. The judge advised the jury not to touch evidence, stating it was real meth, which resulted in a guilty verdict. The court was bifurcated for sentencing at a later time.

James L. Arrasmith · Answer

What you described raises serious concerns about fairness and due process. While judges have discretion over how they manage the courtroom, trials that continue into extreme hours—like 4 AM—can undermine a defendant’s right to a fair trial. Fatigue affects everyone involved: jurors, attorneys, witnesses, and the defendant. When people are exhausted, they’re more likely to make mistakes, misjudge evidence, or rush to a verdict just to end the day. 
 
The judge’s statement about the evidence being “real meth” and advising the jury not to touch it may also have influenced the jury improperly. Judges are expected to remain neutral and not make comments that could be interpreted as endorsing the credibility or nature of the prosecution’s evidence. Even a subtle remark like that can tip the scales unfairly. If the court acknowledged fatigue yet proceeded, it could be argued that the environment was coercive or prejudicial. 
 
If this case is still active or on appeal, this situation should be documented and raised. Courts are supposed to protect your rights, not exhaust them away in the middle of the night. You have every right to question whether the trial was conducted in a way that truly allowed for a just outcome.

Q: Can a judge in AR hold a trial until 4 AM for intent to distribute case?