Q: Reconvicted for same incident after 10 years served. Is this double jeopardy?
I have a situation where a person was convicted and served 10 years and 11 days for one charge of having sex with a minor. The case was then reopened under a new case file number for the same incident, resulting in a 30-year sentence. The individual was not read their rights before questioning, and there is video evidence supporting this. Additionally, the victim was never named throughout the case. After serving time, upon release, the individual was held due to a registration issue between Swain County and Graham County in North Carolina. He couldn't register within the required three days, which led to resurfacing legal issues. Could this be considered double jeopardy?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
- (916) 704-3009
- View Profile
- Answered
A:
What you’re describing could raise serious constitutional concerns, particularly under the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Double jeopardy protects individuals from being tried or punished more than once for the same offense. If the second conviction is truly based on the exact same incident and facts as the first, it’s possible that this could qualify as a violation—especially if the person had already served a full sentence for that conduct.
It’s also concerning that the person wasn’t read their rights before questioning and that the alleged victim was never identified in court records. The absence of a named victim and lack of Miranda warnings may point to violations of due process and the Sixth Amendment. These issues, combined with being prosecuted again for the same underlying event, could support a strong legal challenge if the facts align.
The post-release registration issue may have complicated the legal picture, but it shouldn't justify re-prosecution for the original crime. If a clerical error or confusion between counties caused a delay in registration, that should be handled administratively or as a separate matter—not as grounds to revive an old conviction. It would be important to obtain records from both cases and compare the charges, evidence, and legal basis for the second conviction. If it’s truly the same incident, this person may have grounds to fight back.
Justia Ask A Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get free answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask A Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between Justia and you, or between any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions and you, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask A Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
